Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS

Acquiring tech drives deals; soon, tech may decide deals

By , - Last modified: July 21, 2017 at 6:05 PM

With a slogan of “Turning plant floor data into actionable information,” Julie Lenzer founded the software company Applied Creative Technologies Inc. in 1995.

Focused on data collection, data mining and analytics in the food manufacturing sector, Lenzer’s company started with one key client – a Fortune 100 company.

“I had one of my advisers tell me, ‘You don’t have a company. You have a contract.’ I was like ‘Ouch!’ but she was right,” Lenzer said. The multinational company paid her to develop software but Lenzer retained the rights to sell to other companies.

She recalled the moment with her adviser an ‘a-ha moment.’ “We had a great contract but if something happened to the contract, I had no business – that was my siren call to diversify,” she said.

There are multiple reasons companies choose to acquire assets. Some want to broaden their customer base while others choose to expand their product/service line. But increasingly, the need to acquire technology assets is driving many mergers and acquisitions.

“A lot of [companies] realize that if they don’t make moves, they will find themselves at a discreet disadvantage in the marketplace, mainly because the technology-driven companies can be more nimble,” said David Shohet, MergerTech Advisors’ managing director. “Either they are the competitive threat or they can address the competitive threat that otherwise faces nontechnology focused companies.

“I would say a lot of it is defensive in nature in that they are protecting themselves from missing a trend that may otherwise cause them harm as an organization,” he continued. “But a lot of times organizations realize that the standard teams they have in play, the product that they have developed in the marketplace, it often takes a paradigm shift to get them thinking about a new way to approach the same market they have been serving but in a better technology-delivered means.”


Because technology changes so quickly, it is hard for any company, especially larger ones, to keep up with new trends, which is why many start looking for mergers and acquisitions, said Lenzer, who in 2005 sold her business to an international company based in Iowa.

“It’s basically letting other people do your research and development for you and take the risks of that,” said Lenzer, now the University of Maryland’s associate vice president of innovation and economic development. “Starting up and working with a new technology is often risky, and if someone has already de-risked that for you – they have already proven the technology works – that is a good deal.

“Companies are cutting back in their internal research and development, so acquiring startups or technologies out of universities is a great way to compensate for that.”


Since most companies can’t stand still and almost every industry is becoming more technological, buying a smaller company that has expertise and skilled employees can ramp up a business faster than trying to build it yourself, said Karyl Leggio, a professor of finance at the Sellinger School of Business at Loyola University Maryland.

“The mergers that are least successful, in general, are those that are doing it just for the sake of diversifying or those that way overpay, and those where the companies are of similar size because those tend to have the most difficulty with cultural integration and getting the two firms to work well together,” Leggio said.


Shohet believes the current tech assets trend wave started after the 2008 Great Recession, when technology was seen as a consumable asset that could be transferred from one company to another without the huge risk of it becoming shelf ware.

Many large companies now have hired tech-savvy employees in corporate development roles who understand the strategic plan from the board of directors and can discuss what is better for the company – buy or build organically.

“That has worked very well, I think, for a lot of companies in the last couple years,” he said.


Jim Moore of Fidenti Global Partners said artificial intelligence, where software makes decisions usually performed by people, is getting lots of buzz.

“I think that adoption will be dependent upon an organization’s ability to absorb this technology,” he said. “I think the biggest barrier to adoption is this institutional paranoia about turning over decision-making to software versus people.

“The opportunity for AI to move into some of these functions in the business world is tremendous.”

BridgeTower Media is the parent company of Lehigh Valley Business.

You May Have Missed...

Write to the Editorial Department at editorial@lvb.com

Leave a Comment


Please note: All comments will be reviewed and may take up to 24 hours to appear on the site.

Post Comment
View Comment Policy